Anti-conscription badge : 'FIGHT AS FREEMEN NOT AS CONSCRIPTS / VOTE NO' Accession Number: REL28376.005

Description

Small circular pressed tinplate badge with a celluloid face and a pin attachment to the reverse. `VOTE NO' is printed in white on a red bar across the middle of the badge and there is a red border around the edge of the badge. Curved across the top is `FIGHT AS FREEMEN' and across the bottom is `NOT AS CONSCRIPTS' in dark blue lettering.

Contextual Description

Australian voters were asked in October 1916, and again in December 1917, to vote on the issue of conscription. Universal military training for Australian men aged 18 to 60 had been compulsory since 1911. The referendums, if carried, would have extended this requirement to service overseas.

At the outbreak of the war, the number of people volunteering to enlist for the Australian Imperial Force (AIF) was so high that recruitment officers were turning people away. However, as the war went on, casualty rates increased and the number of volunteers declined, so that by 1916 the AIF faced a shortage of men. Despite opposition from his own party, Labor Prime Minister Billy Hughes decided to take the issue to the people in a referendum. The nation was asked to grant the government the power to compel citizens to serve overseas during the current war. The referendum provoked furious debate within the Australian community. It was held on 28 October 1916, and the proposal for conscription was narrowly defeated.

Enlistment for the war continued to fall however, and in 1917 Hughes called for another referendum on the conscription issue. This conscription campaign was just as heated as the first. On 20 December 1917 the nation again voted 'No' to conscription, this time with a slightly larger majority. Australia and South Africa were the only participating countries not to introduce conscription during the First World War. The conscription referenda were divisive politically, socially and within religious circles. Newspapers and magazines of the time demonstrate the concerns, arguments, and the passion of Australians in debating this issue.

Badges such as this were produced to encourage and display support of the anti-conscription campaigns, and were sold in trams, buses, at railways stations and at rallies.

Details

Accession Number
REL28376.005
Maker
Classification
Heraldry
Object Type
Badge
Physical Description
Material: Celluloid
Material: Paper
Material: Tin
Measurement
Overall: 27 mm x 22 mm
Date Made
c 1916-1917
Place Made
Whole/Part
Whole
Item Count
1
Copyright
Copyright not applicable

Conflicts

Places

Tags

Accession REL28376.005

More like this

Anti conscription badge : 'AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY VOTE NO'

Heraldry REL28376.003 First World War, 1914-1918

Small circular pressed tinplate badge with a celluloid face and a pin attachment to the reverse.`VOTE NO' is printed in red in the middle of a white silhouette of Australia on a blue background. Curve

Anti-conscription badge : 'CONSCRIPTION / NCF / NO'

Heraldry REL28376.001 First World War, 1914-1918

Small circular pressed tinplate badge with a celluloid face and a pin attachment to the reverse. A silhouette of Australia is in white on a red background with `NO' in red lettering in the middle of i

Pro conscription badge : 'VOTE YES / OCT 28 / 1916'

Heraldry REL28376.007 First World War, 1914-1918

Small circular pressed tinplate badge with a celluloid face and a pin attachment to the reverse. `VOTE YES' is printed in red over the Australian red ensign and the Union Jack on crossed staffs. Betwe

Pro consription badge : 'YES'

Heraldry REL/09080.003 First World War, 1914-1918

Small circular pressed tinplate badge with a celluloid face and a pin attachment to the reverse. The word 'YES' is printed in red within a white map of Australia on a blue background. Australian vot

Reinforcements Referendum Vote Yes...

Art AWM2017.1202.1 First World War, 1914-1918

This poster was created in support of the second conscription referendum put to the Australian people on 20 December 1917 by Prime Minister Hughes. It asked citizens: Are you in favour of the proposal

See more similar items →

Record information

Last modified: 18 October 2024 - 3.44 am